From the outside, packaging engineering looks standardized. There are ASTM methods, FEFCO codes, EUMOS standards. But when you're actually in the weeds (switching jobs, onboarding new teams, collaborating across departments), you realize every group works differently.
The workflow from product concept to final tertiary packaging? It's rarely a workflow at all. It's a collection of spreadsheets, email threads, tribal knowledge, and "ask Sarah, she remembers." Engineers spec things in isolation. Shipping and logistics teams palletize loads without visibility into why a box was sized a certain way. Decisions made upstream break things downstream, and nobody finds out until the first container ships.
We've personally watched engineers:
- • Recreate an item from scratch because the original spec was buried in someone's email from 18 months ago
- • Run BCT calculations in three different spreadsheets and get three different answers
- • Fail a pallet stability test because someone assumed "it's always been fine"
- • Lose weeks re-validating a shipper because nobody could find the original test report
This isn't a talent problem. It's a tools problem. Packaging engineers are smart, thorough professionals working with workflows held together by duct tape and institutional memory.